Согласно новому исследованию, ношение масок для лица и социальное дистанцирование фактически приводят к содержанию COVID-19.


The most attention-grabbing practices for controlling an infectious disease esteem COVID-19 aren’t easy to note—holding six ft instead of others,carrying face masksin public, and, whenever you’re a health care employee, carrying shields to give protection to your eyes apart from.

Nevertheless in adetect revealed Monday inThe Lancet, researchers present the strongest proof but that these practices conclude certainly decrease the probability of spreading the virus.

An global team of scientists, led by senior creator Dr. Holger Schunemann, professor of scientific epidemiology and remedy at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, analyzed 172 experiences conducted in 16 countries that checked out the connection between social distancing, carrying masks, and carrying detect security, and the probability of transmitting the virus. The experiences included folk with COVID-19 infections apart from to those with two other ailments attributable to coronaviruses, SARS and MERS. The experiences had been observational, which methodology that they tracked infection rates amongst folk that practiced any of the aforementioned behaviors. Of the 172 experiences, 44 (tantalizing more than 25,000 participants) also included comparisons between those that adopted the behaviors and those that did no longer.

In relation to social distancing, the analysis confirmed that, on common, the probability of getting contaminated when closing 1 meter (a little more than 3 ft) from an contaminated person changed into as soon as about 3%, while staying much less than 1 meter aside upped the probability to 13%. The extra folk stand a long way from every other, the decrease their possibility. In actuality, the probability drops by half of for every extra meter of distancing as much as three meters (about 10 ft).

“What we tried to conclude changed into as soon as lift everything together and form out what distance would be the most attention-grabbing, as a replace of an arbitrary threshold,” says Schunemann. In step with how a long way respiratory droplets from coughs or sneezes in most cases commute, most public health policies for the time being indicate standing no longer much less than 2 meters (about 6.7 ft) aside in public areas, which the detect findings aid. “The virus doesn’t know what a meter is, or what six ft is,” says Schunemann. “What this proof suggests is that two meters, or 6.7 ft, appears to be like to be that it might perchance per chance perchance be more conserving than one meter or three ft.”

The knowledge also supported the advantages of detect shields for health care workers. The probability of infection amongst folk that wore glasses, goggles or other face shields changed into as soon as 6% when put next with 16% amongst those no longer carrying such security.

The experiences included health care workers in hospitals, apart from folk residing in households with an contaminated person. The researchers tracked whether or no longer those in shut contact to folk that had a coronavirus infection saved their distance, wore a conceal or detect security, and whether or no longer they too bought contaminated.

“I changed into as soon as shocked by the magnitude of the enact,” says Schunemann. “In epidemiology we on a typical foundation gape tiny effects, and your total effects we saw right here are regarded as immense or very immense.”

He says the findings aid recent public health advice to diminish the probability of spreading COVID-19, but provides that more detailed experiences are wanted. As an instance, it’s no longer but certain whether or no longer 1 meter of distance will be satisfactory in some settings (when put next with the two meters that are for the time being advised). To boot as, better distances will be wanted when folk are gathered in denser settings or closer quarters—and it’s level-headed risky what the right distance in these scenarios would be.

In health care settings esteem hospitals, a similar experiences are desired to tease aside which kinds of face masks are most attention-grabbing for diversified eventualities. The detect stumbled on that scientific-grade N95 masks and surgical paper masks former in scientific settings supplied the most attention-grabbing security, but that self-made cloth masks are level-headed efficient for the long-established public. These recordsdata, Shunemann says, aid carrying a conceal both to diminish the probability of spreading of the virus whenever you’re contaminated, and to diminish the different of becoming contaminated whenever you’ve no longer but caught the virus. “The form of masks that can perchance also level-headed be historical, and who wears the masks, might perchance also level-headed be investigated extra in randomized managed trials,” says Schunemann. “Nevertheless having talked about that, my interpretation is that carrying even a self-made conceal is more healthy than no longer carrying one thing.”

The Coronavirus Temporary.The whole lot you’ve gotten to know regarding the worldwide spread of COVID-19

Thank you!

For your security, we be pleased sent a affirmation e mail to the address you entered. Click the link to substantiate your subscription and delivery up receiving our newsletters. In case you do now not get the affirmation within 10 minutes, please test your spam folder.

Contact usateditors@time.com.

Leave a Comment